Tags
From:
Steven Clift
Date:
Feb 07 04:23 UTC
Short link
When you removed folders I did use tags for 15 or so files that I
uploaded (when you could upload files independently) for a private
group's file library. I also use them in the board@ group. ... I liked
how tags were conceptually folders and more. Of course now you can't
sort files by tags, but you can search for files pretty well.
Why is an e-mail sent with:
tags: fiscal, marketing
in the top line any different than adding tags when posting a file to a
group via the web? How is this problematic compared to scanning for
unsubscribe commands?
I would agree that unless you can do things both via web and e-mail, you
might as well hide it. Adding multiple files added to one post would
allow a different way of clustering files for later access.
Steve
Dan Randow wrote:
>> if we want
>> to do something special with tags in the future, we won't have
>> anything tagged.
>>
>> I do take the point that they're not being used correctly at the
>> moment though.
>>
>
> With that in mind, I really suspect that we don't have anything tagged
> now. We could find out, by analysing the data, of course, but I don't
> think it's worth bothering. If we start to render tag clouds, we're just
> going further down a path that we know gets difficult fast. (And anyway,
> if we make clouds, wouldn't we put data that we do have in them ie
> 'keywords'?).
>
> We have plenty of priorities that we know will deliver high value.
>
> Leave the existing data, and infrastructure, of course.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Full text of this topic in GroupServer Development:
> http://groupserver.org/r/topic/M091C4k86GxqB0ZU6ff0M
>
> To leave GroupServer Development, email
> mailto:<email obscured>?Subject=unsubscribe
>
> GroupServer Development is powered by
> OnlineGroups.Net http://onlinegroups.net
>
>
